Thinking about the first 100 hour post and the hard times John has faced I would speculate that if there were cheating, though I don't say there is, it would occur against the AP playing at higher stakes. That would give the house the best results with the fewest risks in my opinion. I would like to ask the group members at what level of negative variance would you start to suspect foul play? If you played a lot, tracked you results really sharp, and found one establishment produced markedly consistent negative variances you could have suspicions of foul play and not shop there but how bad does it have to get before you stay out of a joint.