Is PartyPoker rigged?
- Thread starter dacium
- Start date
Ok - you kept saying "we" alot in your first post.
I guess now you're saying you actually played against 3500 separately-dealt dealer upcards, not 3500 hands? (I mean dealt after a round is completed.)
I was just thinking when u played 2 hands against the dealer maybe they'd show up as separate hands and the dealer's upcard might be double-counted.
How does your script recognize when u played 2 hands simultaneously? Or split?
Seriously, if u played against that many dealer upcards, I'd start videotaping every session and/or getting logs.
I just can't see it as possible in a fair game.
I guess now you're saying you actually played against 3500 separately-dealt dealer upcards, not 3500 hands? (I mean dealt after a round is completed.)
I was just thinking when u played 2 hands against the dealer maybe they'd show up as separate hands and the dealer's upcard might be double-counted.
How does your script recognize when u played 2 hands simultaneously? Or split?
Seriously, if u played against that many dealer upcards, I'd start videotaping every session and/or getting logs.
I just can't see it as possible in a fair game.
I don't get it.
You've gone from 15+ standard deviations to about 4?
How did u arrive at either? What changed?
The results u originally stated are simply not possible in a fairly dealt game, at least the way I understand it.
I take it u disagree with Ken's analysis? Which, by the way I agree with, except for the typo of 395 instead of 305 for Kings. But still zero.
Please clarify if u can - I get a little ballistic with accusations like this - so easy to make, so hard to prove.
But, still, nice to know, for whatever reason, you are retracting your original accusation entirely.
I hope they change the title of this thread and add "-NOT". Or something.
You've gone from 15+ standard deviations to about 4?
How did u arrive at either? What changed?
The results u originally stated are simply not possible in a fairly dealt game, at least the way I understand it.
I take it u disagree with Ken's analysis? Which, by the way I agree with, except for the typo of 395 instead of 305 for Kings. But still zero.
Please clarify if u can - I get a little ballistic with accusations like this - so easy to make, so hard to prove.
But, still, nice to know, for whatever reason, you are retracting your original accusation entirely.
I hope they change the title of this thread and add "-NOT". Or something.
for example 234 cards and a chance of 1/13 of drawing a card makes variance (234*1/13*12/13) =~ 16, so standard deviation is about 4.
4 standard deviations is norm dist is 99.99366575163% or 1 in 15786
Where to go from here I don't know...
the probability could be anywhere between 1 in 15786 and 1 in 15786^13
but you have to be careful not to fall into the whole of calculating the probability to specifically. For example calculating the exact probability of these numbers does actually mean anything, we have to know how to get this average standard deviation or worse.
4 standard deviations is norm dist is 99.99366575163% or 1 in 15786
Where to go from here I don't know...
the probability could be anywhere between 1 in 15786 and 1 in 15786^13
but you have to be careful not to fall into the whole of calculating the probability to specifically. For example calculating the exact probability of these numbers does actually mean anything, we have to know how to get this average standard deviation or worse.Thanks for replying.
234 cards with a 1/13 chance= 3024 cards in total?
Still don't get the magic of 234?
In any case I think we're trying to figure out the chances of that total distribution of dealer upcards in a fair game.
What is your problem with Ken's analysis? (Maybe that's another way to approach it.)
Are u sure ur perl script or whatever did not count splits as 2 hands? That when u played 2 hands u did not double count the dealer upcard?
Did u ever do the number of dealer BJ's thing?
234 cards with a 1/13 chance= 3024 cards in total?
Still don't get the magic of 234?
In any case I think we're trying to figure out the chances of that total distribution of dealer upcards in a fair game.
What is your problem with Ken's analysis? (Maybe that's another way to approach it.)
Are u sure ur perl script or whatever did not count splits as 2 hands? That when u played 2 hands u did not double count the dealer upcard?
Did u ever do the number of dealer BJ's thing?