I'm sorry to hear that *LINK*
I'm glad that you won, but I'm sorry to hear that you were playing baccarat. Reading some of Thorpe's work on the game should give you a better understanding of what you are up against. In fact, both Griffin and May also published information on beating the game (or, trying to at least) as well.
> And was planning to go to Vegas to play a better game with like 10k. How does
> a dd game with decent rules and about 60-65 pen compare to a game with 6
> decks and 1.5 cut off with good rules + surrender.
This is an excellent question. Unfortunately, it is one that you should already know if you are heading to Vegas with $10k. You have a LONG way to go before you are ready to hit the tables. However, since you seem to be a gambler at heart I will assume that you will ignore my warnings and jump straight to the information.
In any case, here are come preliminary results. They all assume a Hi-Low player (Ill18 & Fab 4) with a $10k bankroll and an optimal bet spread. They were generated by Norm's CVCX online, which I highly recommend you check out (http://www.qfit.com/cvcxonlineviewer.htm).
6D H17 DAS LS 75% 1:12 spread:
EV=0.845%
Win Rate=$14.98/Hour
SD/Hr=46.469
ROR=5.9%
N0=47195
DI=4.6
If you can Wong In/Out at +1 you can do much better:
EV=1.985%
Win Rate=$32.34/Hour
SD/Hr=20.92
ROR=4.7%
N0=20256
DI=7.03
DD H17 DAS 50% 1:8 spread:
EV=0.754%
Win Rate=$13.28/Hour
SD/Hr=36.78
ROR=4.6%
N0=49158
DI=4.51
As you can see, the DD with bad penetration scores the worst. In general, the most important factor is the level of penetration. You will also notice that the hourly variance in the play-all game is enormous and the long run will be more than twice as far away when compared to the backcounting strategy. That means you will risking more, earning less, and playing much longer that you need to be.
Of course, vast improvements could be made on all of these strategies, but I will leave it up to you to develop you own personal style of play.
-Sonny-