Well, the TC will probably be zero around 40-45% of the time, but of the other 55-60% of the time the count will be positive around 50% (depending on whether you round/truncate/floor/etc.).Friendo said:For all numbers of decks and all balanced counts, the count is positive 50% of the time.
It completely depends on the penetration. The deeper they cut, the more positive counts you will see. The charts in Blackjack Attack give the TC frequencies for most situations.ascension said:if i am only playing at a count per deck equal/greater than +2 what is my expected frequency that this will occur per shoe/deck.
Can't remember the reason for this. It superficially seems to contradict the True Count Theorem, but, of course, it doesn't.Sonny said:It completely depends on the penetration. The deeper they cut, the more positive counts you will see.
the (info from Wong's book) image below may help:ascension said:my guess is that with more decks their will be less frequency of positive counts...but what is the estimated frequency of positive counts i can expect for single deck, dd, 6d, 8d?? thanks, and can someone explain why this is...thanks guys.
It doesn't say you will never have an advantage over 3.5%, only that it happens closer to 0% than .5%.ascension said:so if i'm reading those charts correctly by arnold snyder in the link...if i use a 1-16 spread playing a avg. 6deck game with 4.5d pen using system 1 i can expect an hourly rate of 2.90 units, given i can play a hundred hands in an hour? this seems to good to be true....i found this a really interesting read so far briancp (thankyou!), interesting that in a 6d game with 4.5d pen house and player never have more than a 3.5% adv.