that he read a book by Donald Dahl. The book he says exposes the myth of card counting. The jist of it is he says that with perfect Basic Strategy play and positive progression betting the player is at least as well off as any card counter. He said you also need a much smaller bankroll and the casinos heat is useless against you. He said the anti progression betting camp always comes up with "oh that's Matingale and it's a loser". But he says that is bunk-he says that Martingale is a whole other deal.
Is there anyone among you who agree with this idea?
Is there anyone among you who agree with this idea?