azbetsgonewild
Active Member
I have experienced this on more than one occasion, and of course one can blame on natural standard deviation. But what are the extremes?
However, I can remember one specific shoe, late night probably 1am, no one else at the table, out of a 6deck shoe I lost exactly 1 hand. That was completely rediculous in a good way of course(started with nothing, ended with more than $3k+)
I can also remember other instances where I won maybe 1 hand out of an entire 6 deck shoe. Infact probably more than one horrifying instances, I once counted a 22 hand consecutive loss, luckily at a table min of $5.
Obviously, strange things can happen in a casino card game. I have one one occasion been dealt 4 blackjacks in a row, and also seen the dealer get a blackjack 5 out of 6 consecutive hands. In these occasions I would be inclined to blame close card values being clumped into one area of the shoe, perhaps not shuffled througoughly from the beginning therefore keeping some aces and kings/queens in the same general part of the shoe, but its still fishy.
This has happened on all occasions in a machine shuffled shoe. As we all know, the initial distribution of the cards is random, but the machines shuffle in a predictable manner, its nearly impossible for a machine to do a truely random job like a human can.
Anyone else have odd experiences good and bad to report?
However, I can remember one specific shoe, late night probably 1am, no one else at the table, out of a 6deck shoe I lost exactly 1 hand. That was completely rediculous in a good way of course(started with nothing, ended with more than $3k+)
I can also remember other instances where I won maybe 1 hand out of an entire 6 deck shoe. Infact probably more than one horrifying instances, I once counted a 22 hand consecutive loss, luckily at a table min of $5.
Obviously, strange things can happen in a casino card game. I have one one occasion been dealt 4 blackjacks in a row, and also seen the dealer get a blackjack 5 out of 6 consecutive hands. In these occasions I would be inclined to blame close card values being clumped into one area of the shoe, perhaps not shuffled througoughly from the beginning therefore keeping some aces and kings/queens in the same general part of the shoe, but its still fishy.
This has happened on all occasions in a machine shuffled shoe. As we all know, the initial distribution of the cards is random, but the machines shuffle in a predictable manner, its nearly impossible for a machine to do a truely random job like a human can.
Anyone else have odd experiences good and bad to report?
Last edited: