Surrender with Negative TC

[bj2I]

I know most of you leave the table when the TC becomes negative. However, if you would be playing at a negative TC at a table where surrender is offered at what point does it become better to take a hit rather than surrender?

Thanks.

 

[21forme]

Do you own any BJ books?

 

[creeping panther]

Bj

I know most of you leave the table when the TC becomes negative. However, if you would be playing at a negative TC at a table where surrender is offered at what point does it become better to take a hit rather than surrender?

Thanks.

No snide remarks from me, I am the friendly one here:grin:

Now, playing in negative counts takes alot of study and memorizing many negative indice plays, and if you would or would not use them when LS is offered,,,it is a sort of a specialist game you are inquiring about. Usually you should leave the table at -2tc.

Start reading books by Wong, Snyder, Don S, Blackwood, Renzey, Bootlegger, etc. Also the Wizard of Odds is very valuable, as well as Norms Qfit.

Best to you my friend.

Always Warm And Fuzzy,
CP

 

[Deathclutch]

It is completely dependent on the count that you use. You can use CVData to generate all the indices you'll need, although you won't need a ton of surrender indices. It's better just to leave by that point.

 

[moo321]

It is completely dependent on the count that you use. You can use CVData to generate all the indices you'll need, although you won't need a ton of surrender indices. It's better just to leave by that point.

Keep in mind, though, that surrender indices are stronger for wongers or BP teams. 13-14 v. X-A, 14-15 v. 9, 16 v. 8-7

 

[Nynefingers]

Keep in mind, though, that surrender indices are stronger for wongers or BP teams. 13-14 v. X-A, 14-15 v. 9, 16 v. 8-7

Moo, this thread is about indices for play in negative true counts. That won't be an issue for wongers or BP teams.

 

[moo321]

Moo, this thread is about indices for play in negative true counts. That won't be an issue for wongers or BP teams.

I was responding to the claim that you "won't need a ton of surrender indices". Sort of true, but it depends on your playing style. If you come in at +3, then you want some obscure surrender indices.

 

[Deathclutch]

I was responding to the claim that you "won't need a ton of surrender indices". Sort of true, but it depends on your playing style. If you come in at +3, then you want some obscure surrender indices.

A person asking this sort of question most likely won't need a ton of surrender indices

 

[Nynefingers]

I know most of you leave the table when the TC becomes negative. However, if you would be playing at a negative TC at a table where surrender is offered at what point does it become better to take a hit rather than surrender?

Thanks.

I was responding to the claim that you "won't need a ton of surrender indices". Sort of true, but it depends on your playing style. If you come in at +3, then you want some obscure surrender indices.

He's not talking about coming in at +3. He's talking about not even wonging out in a negative count.