I was wondering about this myself. I am thankful that this site exists and truely grateful for all expert (and some not so expert) advise that I have received here, however, no offense to Ken, but clicking thanx after each useful post, seems like it may turn things into a popularity contest.PrinceDragon said:errr,does this new feature mean anything
P.D.
I vote "NAY" on that. :laugh:zengrifter said:As opposed to simply a YEA vote ("Thanks") there should be a NAY vote as well. zg
I agree. If anything, it will help show which posters are giving out misinformationzengrifter said:As opposed to simply a YEA vote ("Thanks") there should be a NAY vote as well. zg
usually these people expose themselves, and that's kind of fun to watch as well.SleightOfHand said:I agree. If anything, it will help show which posters are giving out misinformation
No, if you mean that anything occurs as a result of being thanked or not being thanked. But it does give you an easy way to express support for helpful posts.PrinceDragon said:errr,does this new feature mean anything?
I would rather see just a Thumbs Up/Down function anonymous - counts theKenSmith said:No, if you mean that anything occurs as a result of being thanked or not being thanked. But it does give you an easy way to express support for helpful posts.
For what purpose? How is a contest to elect someone Miss Congeniality any value to the members of this site??zengrifter said:I would rather see just a Thumbs Up/Down function anonymous - counts the
Yea/Nay - and a separate Thank You if the reader wants to be ID'd.
Then a roll-call page of the top 20-40 members with post count, yea/nay count, and thank you count. zg
The Yea/Nay is not a popularity - it follows in the vein of all Web socialkewljason said:For what purpose? How is a contest to elect someone Miss Congeniality any value to the members of this site??
The purpose of this board as I understand it and as stated in the first line of "the welcome page" is to share information and advise. So because a poster has x number of "stars" next to their name makes their infomation any more valuable?? I have read some posts from reliable experienced respected players that have opinions that fly in the face of the mathematics of blackjack or are just flat out incorrect.zengrifter said:The Yea/Nay is not a popularity - it follows in the vein of all Web social
media, establishing levels of trust among readers, posters, lurkers. zg
We avoid that with a thumbs-up/down vote, which is anonymous.kewljason said:Isn't it up to each reader to use his/her own brain to determine what is and isn't correct?? Or do we just conclude that poster x said it is so and he has 8 stars to his name, therefore it must be so!
Right: Thumbs up/down, also FLAG, -- but NO Thank You. zgFinn Dog said:Just seems if there's a feature for people to voice their support of a post through a thumbs up, a more true sampling of a post's merritt might be determined with an option for people to voice their differing opinion via a thumbs down.
Thank Youkensmith said:a thumbs-up/thumbs-down approach, even if anonymous, seems like it would cause more divisiveness, so i don't want to try that experiment. Besides, i'm not sure a convenient plug-in solution for that exists.
However, it is apparent that the thank you feature was more controversial than i expected. It seems to work well on some other boards where i participate, but perhaps this forum is different.
Maybe i'm reacting to a vocal minority, but i'm disabling the feature for now.