No, that's certainly not true. That would be the odds (using about 0.473 for Y) of losing 15 hands in a row at the start of the shoe -- the very first 15 hands you play. This is almost certainly not the way it happened. Instead, during the course of playing perhaps several hundred hands, the poster hit a streak where he lost 15 hands in a row -- not at all "impossible."Hell'nBack said:Very easy calculation. YxY(15)
Assuming ALL losses, with NO pushes, losing 15 in a row right off the bat is a 1 in 75,000 shot. That's probably NOT what happened!gronbog said:Just saw Don's response. My reponse says that you will hit such a streak once in 13,763 hands on average assuming that you just keep playing and playing. If you want to know the odds of this happening within some fixed number of hands, then yes, the math is much more difficult.
Me too! At the high-limit room at Caesars A.C.gronbog said:Ignoring pushes, you win about 47% of your hands and lose about 53%. Odds of 15 losses without a win are 0.53 ^ 15 = 0.00007314 = 0.007314% or 1 in 13,763. Rare but not ridiculous.
I once lost 23 hands without a win.
gronbog said:I once lost 23 hands without a win.
Key question: Did you stop playing? Or was count positive and you said it was not a quitting point? LOLDSchles said:Me too! At the high-limit room at Caesars A.C.
Don
The count was astronomical. I was playing two hands of max bets. I would have died before quitting, although the incredulous pit boss watching was pleading with me to get up and change tables. When this happens, it's almost impossible to explain to others why you don't stop "throwing good money after bad" and keep shoving out the huge bets. It was one of the worst shoes of my life.MJGolf said:Key question: Did you stop playing? Or was count positive and you said it was not a quitting point? LOL
All you need to do is quote them the appropriate BJA3 page number.DSchles said:When this happens, it's almost impossible to explain to others why you don't stop "throwing good money after bad" and keep shoving out the huge bets.
My streak happened over the course of two shoes at neutral counts. I only lost a few hundred dollars.MJGolf said:Key question: Did you stop playing? Or was count positive and you said it was not a quitting point? LOL
Lucky you!gronbog said:My streak happened over the course of two shoes at neutral counts. I only lost a few hundred dollars.
Look at the bright side - it could have been a "which count is best?" discussion.KewlJ said:I am always amazed at the "lost xx hands in a row discussions".
Yeah but that has already been settled.21forme said:Look at the bright side - it could have been a "which count is best?" discussion.
DSchles said:The count was astronomical. I was playing two hands of max bets. I would have died before quitting, although the incredulous pit boss watching was pleading with me to get up and change tables. When this happens, it's almost impossible to explain to others why you don't stop "throwing good money after bad" and keep shoving out the huge bets. It was one of the worst shoes of my life.
I had another similar experience at Bellagio, but it wasn't all in one shoe. And, it had come just minutes after I had run a single shoe at Harrah's for the exact opposite of my Caesars experience, and a huge score.
The game can be crazy, huh?
Don
Naw, reached max bet very quickly, then lost every hand in the shoe.MJGolf said:I'm thinking if the count kept rising, that your bets increased, even with the losing streak. They probably thought you were almost martingaling! LOL And yes, this game can be crazy...........the more years you play, the more you see. Just shake your head, smile and go on.
I typically notice that I'm on a streak (either way) at about 5 rounds.KewlJ said:Can I ask, when do you start counting losing rounds? after each loss do you say "that's 1".
Conversely, I've been berated by fellow players for sticking to minimum bets in the midst (as they see it) of a rampant lucky streak!DSchles said:When this happens, it's almost impossible to explain to others why you don't stop "throwing good money after bad"