gamblingghost
Well-Known Member
That is exactly what I though. Either that, or you have an ultra ugly face, the pit boss is tired of looking at you.
Are you out of jr. high yet?
That is exactly what I though. Either that, or you have an ultra ugly face, the pit boss is tired of looking at you.
What? What the heck triggered it? Past performance?
My first back-off happened not too long ago at a big store on the east coast. Was a regular (once a week or so) there for the past year or so playing pretty chunky green action ($25-500 spread) with very little cover. After taking ~$50,000 off them on my player's card (plus thousands in comps), I think ultimately they had to review my play based on pretty consistent winning (generally under $3k per visit) over a longer term.
I figured it was only a matter of time, seeing as how I was playing rated. In fact, I was surprised at how long it ultimately took them.
For now, I'm taking a break from BJ there for a bit and will play poker when I go there. I will ultimately play smaller stakes unrated in the future.
That being said, I have a weeklong Vegas trip planned for July and will be playing very aggressively. I am expecting multiple back-offs during the trip.
Yeah, you need to start hiding your winnings. There's guys on this forum who are way up on the year but the casinos show a loss.
That's how you debate.
What you DO need to do though, is keep track of your lifetime win and stop using a card when it's close to the limit
Where's that PUBLISHED at?????
What you DO need to do though, is keep track of your lifetime win and stop using a card when it's close to the limit
Where's that PUBLISHED at?????
At most big casinos that # is around 50K
There's no way to know for certain what the cutoff is
Exactly my point.
Depending on the EV of your play it may not be possible to rathole enough to cover it. Almost every place tracks black chips, and there's a limit to how much green and red you can take off a game.
What you DO need to do though, is keep track of your lifetime win and stop using a card when it's close to the limit
you can make an educated guess on what the limit is.
Indeed. While I did rathole as much as possible, it seemed like the majority of my winnings were from having big positive variance shoes where I would win 1.5k-2k in a shoe, rather than grinding it out. I always figure that it's best to leave a table after a big win rather than stay around and going back to my min bet while trying to rathole more. You just can't easily hide four-figure wins in 15-20 minute timeframe without being blatant about pocketing chips.
Ultimately, I think I was probably able to rathole 10k-15k of my winnings, but I was still a winning player on their records. I don't know the exact number, as I wasn't willing to give them my SSN to find out my +/-.
You dont give a SSN to get your yearly win/loss...
Hate to beat a dead horse here. But how would you go about guessing? And what has educated you to the point of making that guess?
You're just shooting off numbers.....
I got half shoed last week.
I wasn't counting, and was flat betting table minimum the whole time. Was actually the first time I got half shoed ever.
You probably got caught ratholing. They know you are up to no good and have probably been assessing all missing chips to you every time you play. If you played with a successful ratholer after that every chip he ratholed is now considered to be in your bank account. They may have you down as winning over a $100,000 by now.
Nope, I didn't give a rating card, and I've never counted cards at this place.
The game was hot, I'll leave it at that.
Nuff said!![]()
I know a good friend that I have accompanied a few times in the last 6 months to a big casino in Vegas. He doesn't count but is up well over 50 over about 10 trips net, winning about 8/10 times. Presumably, from what I've read on here, they just let him be cuz they 'know' it's just a matter of time b4 he donates it all back, right? When, if at all, will they just stop him? Or are the bigger houses OK with it? I was thinking they might be, almost like a loss leader at a strore, in that others will think it's viable for them and will likely give back more than he would take anyway. Thoughts? Thanks Steve