I’m a little confused by the question too. If you mean the dealer’s upcard it would be A,T,9,8,2,3,7,4,5,6 in that order. For the player’s first card it would be 6,5,7,4,3,2,8,9,T,A in that order.
Dealers Blackjack is bad for players.... that's 2 card.
Then...
If I get 20 with 2 card thats good, but also if I get 20 with 5 card thats good too. So I guess it doesnt matter if I get 2 or 5, provided the dealer doesn't pull 21 on 3,4,5,6,7,8, or 9 card.
From an overall EV perspective the order of cards from worst to best is 5, 4, 3, 6, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, A. The five is the worst because it will turn any stiff into a made hand which obviously favors the dealer.
From an overall EV perspective the order of cards from worst to best is 5, 4, 3, 6, 2, 7, 8, 9, 10, A. The five is the worst because it will turn any stiff into a made hand which obviously favors the dealer.
it is not true
3 IS bed card
bed for players
3+3=6
3+2=5
3+4=7
9+3=12
10+3=13
j+3=13
d+3=13
k+3=13
3------------------------------9 times bed
5+2=7
5+7=12
5+8=13
5+9=14
5+10=15
j+5=15
d+5=15
k+5=15
5------------------------------8 times bed
good for players
3+5
3+6
3+7
3+8
3------------------------------4 times good
5+3
5+4
5+5
5+6
5-------------------------------5 times good
it is not true
3 IS bed card
bed for players
3+3=6
3+2=5
3+4=7
9+3=12
10+3=13
j+3=13
d+3=13
k+3=13
3------------------------------9 times bed
5+2=7
5+7=12
5+8=13
5+9=14
5+10=15
j+5=15
d+5=15
k+5=15
5------------------------------8 times bed
good for players
3+5
3+6
3+7
3+8
3------------------------------4 times good
5+3
5+4
5+5
5+6
5-------------------------------5 times good
You are question is very unclear.
I assume that are referring to the dealer's "upcard"
You always want the dealer to display a 6, 5, 4, or 3 -- but the deuce is still BETTER (for YOU) than a 7 or higher.
I don't know what he meant either since he seems to have gone from "2 is more bad than 5" in his first post to "5 is more bad than 2" in his last post.
But, as far as what you seem to be saying, I'd much rather face a dealer upcard of 7 than a dealer upcard of 2. Heck, I'd rather face a dealer upcard of 7 than a dealer upcard of 3.
Since I have higher expected value vs the dealer 7 than a 2 or a 3 in both cases.
mayby
jast try to play 1 deck game remove first 4,5, and play 50 times in real cards not sim after remove all 23 and send my true results how many times you win use basik strategy.
mayby
jast try to play 1 deck game remove first 4,5, and play 50 times in real cards not sim after remove all 23 and send my true results how many times you win use basik strategy.
mayby
jast try to play 1 deck game remove first 4,5, and play 50 times in real cards not sim after remove all 23 and send my true results how many times you win use basik strategy.
He wants to know whether it would be more advantageous overall to remove one 4 and one 5 from a deck or one 2 and one 3. In a 1D H17 DAS DOA game with a cut card a BS player would have roughly a 1.3% edge over the house if a 4 and 5 were removed. With a 2 and 3 removed the players edge would be roughly half that, 0.66%.
Check out the Wizzard of Odds site on Probability. http://wizardofodds.com/blackjack/appendix2.html
In a nutshell here are percentages that the dealer will BUST, with any given card showing. One deck, dealer hit's soft 17
ACE-20%
2-35%
3-37%
4-40%
5-42%
6-43%
7-25%
8-23%
9-23%
10-23%
mayby
jast try to play 1 deck game remove first 4,5, and play 50 times in real cards not sim after remove all 23 and send my true results how many times you win use basik strategy.
Not a chance. You can do it if you want; there are 2,000,000 hand combinations and I'm not doing that to prove to you something as trivial as why 5 is the worst card in the deck. If you don't believe the sims, then don't believe the sims. There's nobody who has a vested interest in your playing blackjack well except for you and your mother.