A7 v 2

smithj

Well-Known Member
(6D, S17)

According to CVData the index to double on this hand is 1... however, I have lost 2 of 3 times so far (two spots with big bets; TC was > 3; the dealer didn't bust because of my play :cry:)

...so I was considering to avoid this index and stick to BS which is a stand. Any comments?

Thanks in advance,

J.
 
Last edited:

bj bob

Well-Known Member
smithj said:
(6D, S17)

According to CVData the index to double on this hand is 1... however, I have lost 2 of 3 times so far (two spots with big bets; TC was > 3; the dealer didn't bust because of my play :cry:)

...so I was seriously considering to avoid this index and stick to BS which is a stand. Any comments?

Thanks in advance,

J.
2 of 3 times, heah? I didn't get paid on three straight BJs last night(pushed). That statistic is absolutely meaningless. You cannot possibly infer anything from a sample of three. You need to readjust your perspective to the long run if you are serious about AP. Always trust the math.
 

Sharky

Well-Known Member
yes, your sample size is severely lacking...give it a few more million tries and report back in oh, say, June of 2061 :laugh:
 

smithj

Well-Known Member
lol maybe I didn't express myself properly... 2 of 3 times, because I have just learned that index a month ago... and for sure I know that 2 of 3 times is nothing... for that reason, I started this thread because some of you guys have those "million tries"... so based on your experience... do you use this index play?

J.
 
Last edited:

FLASH1296

Well-Known Member
YES … you continue to make the play as called for by the T.C.

However, if you have nagging bankroll issues you will want to use a Risk Averse Index which will be +2 for your count in all likelihood.
 

NightStalker

Well-Known Member
use Risk Aversion indices

you may try using +2 if the original is +1 to lower your variance.
BS is also fine, it helps in lowering the variance at the cost of EV..
 

Sharky

Well-Known Member
yes, that and several others...also understand that like BS, indices change with rules and # of decks so know your game and it's indices...don't take a knife to a gun battle.

good luck
 

smithj

Well-Known Member
NightStalker said:
you may try using +2 if the original is +1 to lower your variance.
BS is also fine, it helps in lowering the variance at the cost of EV..
Yes, I was doing exactly that... actually at 3... thanks!
 

NightStalker

Well-Known Member
that's good

smithj said:
Yes, I was doing exactly that... actually at 3... thanks!
I've lost my max bets-thrice at +6 when i doubled on soft 19 and got an ace which lost to dealer 21. If I would have stayed, dealer would have busted..
and yes, I still remember those three soft 19's double down :)
 

shadroch

Well-Known Member
smithj said:
(6D, S17)

According to CVData the index to double on this hand is 1... however, I have lost 2 of 3 times so far (two spots with big bets; TC was > 3; the dealer didn't bust because of my play :cry:)

...so I was considering to avoid this index and stick to BS which is a stand. Any comments?

Thanks in advance,

J.
How many other indices are you using? Its not like this one is going to change your life, one way or the other.
 
Top