Hi-Opt II with an Ace side count is a very powerful strategy that edges out AOII with a SC except for very deep penetrations that no longer exist, albeit very difficult to use. Hi-Opt I is simply a lousy count. Sorry Igor.
I noticed that 2 of the I18 plays are:
12 vs. 5, TC = -2
12 vs. 6, TC = -1
I'm sure they're correct but just seems REALLY counterintuitive. I'm the type of person who likes to know or see the "why" behind something. I guess practically it doesn't matter, just know it and do it.
Thanks for all the input guys. It was very helpful and I'm currently reevaluating my game.
A question about splitting 10s: Is the mathematically correct play to split just once or resplit until the TC drops below the index?
Hmmm CVCX does not agree with you Norm, Hi-Opt II with ace SC is still the bestest.
Depends on the exact configuration.
In an attempt to account for different rules, etc, I ran 39,936 sims each for SD, DD, 6D and 8D for the common strategies, two different spreads, all penetrations, 16 rule combinations and then combined the SCOREs weighted by the currently existing frequencies of rules in U.S. casinos. Hi-Opt II won at all penetrations in double-deck. In the other deck games, AOII edged out Hi-Opt II at very high penetrations.
I am just curious what kind of rules would make AOII edge out Hi-Opt II and what penetrations. For shoe games the most common rules by far are S17 DAS.
I didn't look at individual sims. H17, DAS edges out S17, DAS in number of U.S. tables for 6D. Closely followed by H17, DAS, RSA.
norm