sevencard2003
Well-Known Member
yeah i posted about this once earlier, but this is a new and rather dumb question maybe, but im getting really frustrated. why is it that the count is negative almost all the time? id think it would have an equal chance of being both positive and negative should it not? ive been losing my ass on it and now my rolls down to only $2000, and i shouldve just used it for $1-2 NL and id been much better off.
maybe i should just get up instead of min bet when the shoes negative? but its the only machine around, and i like locking up all 5 spots on it to MYSELF, so no one else can play. then i can spread from 1 hand of $3 to 5 hands of $100, although i never go over 5 hands of $30 with my meager roll, and seldom do i bet that. (about once every 200 hands). i seem to be forever sitting through bad shoes waiting for the shuffle.
and also if the decks slightly negative anything at all, aint i supposed to hit 13 against 12 or 12 against 14? the problem with counting these down is u have no idea how near its getting to the shuffle.
maybe i should just get up instead of min bet when the shoes negative? but its the only machine around, and i like locking up all 5 spots on it to MYSELF, so no one else can play. then i can spread from 1 hand of $3 to 5 hands of $100, although i never go over 5 hands of $30 with my meager roll, and seldom do i bet that. (about once every 200 hands). i seem to be forever sitting through bad shoes waiting for the shuffle.
and also if the decks slightly negative anything at all, aint i supposed to hit 13 against 12 or 12 against 14? the problem with counting these down is u have no idea how near its getting to the shuffle.