Nah, Ken didn't "lie" to you. His book has some pretty good basics about tournament play but they are "generalities" compared to the book Wong put out which has been the bible of tournament play for years and years.newbie said:I just bought this book called "Play to win". It is suppose to be on blackjack tournament strategy. The author won the world series of blackjack last year. His name is Ken Einiger. You mean to tell me that he lied to me when the website I bought it from said it was a blackjack tournament book? You said there is only one book on blackjack tournament? Should I cancel my order?
Being a Pro, especially in a tournament, is no guarantee that the Pro will even qualify through the rounds leading up to the final table. Publishing a book on the other hand, will make money. Look at all the books on Poker and Blackjack that have sold well.newbie said:ok, so i just thought of something. Why would somebody write a book on how to win at blackjack tournaments if the person that reads the book is going to pay against the author(the million dollar blackjack tournament for example) and then beat him at his own game? Doesn't sound right to me.
Thats what I said. I already said that. You just repeated what I said. That was what the topic of my post above yours was about. Let me rephrase: Why would a professional blackjack tournament player write a book and give away his secrets? He won't reveal everything in his book. So the book is just one of those books that he put together real fast to make money and he isn't really teaching how to win at blackjack tournaments.Mikeaber said:And furthermore, what makes you think that a Pro writing a book is going to disclose everything he knows about the tournament game :devil:
Wow, you surely have an attitude Newbie! My point was that writing a book that sells is probably going to be a more lucrative and dependable investment than winning Blackjack tournaments. The part I stated about not the Pro not telling you EVERYTHING in the book was more "tongue in cheek" and definitely not implying that the Author is Lying to you. By the way, I see nothing at all wrong in someone who has "paid his dues" going another step and writing a book that will allow him to capitalize on his experiences as long as the book is valid. Ken's book is valid!newbie said:Thats what I said. I already said that. You just repeated what I said. That was what the topic of my post above yours was about. Let me rephrase: Why would a professional blackjack tournament player write a book and give away his secrets? He won't reveal everything in his book. So the book is just one of those books that he put together real fast to make money and he isn't really teaching how to win at blackjack tournaments.
This conversation is finished. You are below me.Mikeaber said:Wow, you surely have an attitude Newbie!
Cool. :cry:newbie said:This conversation is finished. You are below me.
You can argue with yourself.