Lucky Ladies is awful

takinfromindians97

takinfromindians97

Well-Known Member
THIS COUNT IS FOR LL DOUBLE DECK ONLY DO NOT ATTEMPT THIS WITH A SHOE GAME...

A-9 = +1
T-K = -2
First Q of H = -10
Second Q of H = -2

Make the wager with a TC of 11 or higher.
 
hawkeye

hawkeye

Well-Known Member
I always pay attention to the LL bet when I'm counting because so many other people seem to play it. The only times it's been obviously hitting are the few times where I've seen the TC around 5. Still never played it, but I think around there it gets close.

Do all joints count the A9 as a 20 on LL? The ones near me do, it's any 20. Just wondering if that's the universal rule?
 
Mimosine

Mimosine

Well-Known Member
hawkeye said:
Do all joints count the A9 as a 20 on LL? The ones near me do, it's any 20. Just wondering if that's the universal rule?
Click to expand...
yes actually you'll see an A9 (i think red) in the PRINTED paytable as a 9 or 10:1 payout, read it the next time you're at the table.

The bet is +EV at TC=5 Hi/Lo with less variance at 7.

Play it early and play it hard is my motto!
 
SleightOfHand

SleightOfHand

Well-Known Member
Zen TC for LL (AC payouts)

Running sims I see that LL is profitable at +10 for zen for a 8D game with payouts at 1000/125/19/9/4. However, the advantage at +10 is a small ~.75%. Can someone verify this please?
 
Last edited:
U

UncrownedKing

Well-Known Member
Running sims I see that LL is profitable at +10 for zen for a 8D game with payouts at 1000/125/19/9/4. However, the advantage at +10 is a small ~.75%. Can someone verify this please?
Click to expand...
(Dead link: http://www.blackjackinfo.com/bb/show...cky+ladies+zen)
Click to expand...
Found this pretty useful.
 
PrinceDragon

PrinceDragon

Well-Known Member
Finn Dog said:
ZG: Do I recall correctly that on 6 decks with Hi-Lo the strike point you advise is TC +7?

Best regards,

FD
Click to expand...
Looking at my CVDATA's LL9 sims that shows TC+7 has +EV~3.1%

P.D.
 
SleightOfHand

SleightOfHand

Well-Known Member
UncrownedKing said:
Found this pretty useful.
Click to expand...
Yea, I checked that link before. However, the only sim I found was for DD. I think that there may be a lower index for 8D games since the off the top HE for multideck games are lower due to the additional Qh's.
 
U

UncrownedKing

Well-Known Member
The Sim was for 6D, which I would guess to be extremely close to the 8D EV.

Scroll down a bit, the OP says the second sim was for 6D.
 
SleightOfHand

SleightOfHand

Well-Known Member
UncrownedKing said:
The Sim was for 6D, which I would guess to be extremely close to the 8D EV.

Scroll down a bit, the OP says the second sim was for 6D.
Click to expand...
Hmmm I wonder how I missed that... lol.
 
E

ExhibitCAA

Well-Known Member
My Lucky Ladies analysis is bigger than yours

Zengrifter says: "I doubt that CAA has more info on LLs than BJINFO already has. zg"

Mr. Grifter, would you like to wager on that?
 
zengrifter

zengrifter

Banned
ExhibitCAA said:
Zengrifter says: "I doubt that CAA has more info on LLs than BJINFO already has. zg"
Mr. Grifter, would you like to wager on that?
Click to expand...
I conceded per below. Would you like to wager that I immediately sized up your plight in the slammer,
ran the strategy down to Stalker, and then preselected your lead attorney, Bill Terry? zg

----------
Originally Posted by Automatic Monkey
If you sequence, instead of sequencing aces you can
sequence the queens and beat them up on the sidebet.
------------
 
Pro21

Pro21

Well-Known Member
Automatic Monkey said:
Just to clarify, I didn't buy CAA yet, sequencing the queens is something developed in the Monkey Lab.
Click to expand...
OK, I'll bite. Why would you sequence a queen - even the queen of hearts which we know the expectation is X (page 66 of Exhibit CAA) when you could sequence an ace and bet 10 times as much for a much higher expectation?

Anyone with good sequencing abilities is not going to waste their time on Lucky Ladies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top