matteotm
Well-Known Member
Hi guys, LOL
well after my "i quit blackjack posts" sorry to say im back again ... i have been back twice after 3 weeks of "qutting" won some money back didnt let my self take it so seriously this time.. went expecting to lose.
one thing i did was hit a soft 18 against a dealer 10.. drawing i think a 6 or 7 hit again for a picture to bust.,(the lady who bet behind had a go at me of course)
the same hand came up ...after some lengthy thought i decided to stand going against basic strat. of course the next card was a "3" i let out a few colorful words but was not surprised ..
my question is...........soft 18 vS TEN and ACE
does any1 actually HIT on soft 18 and feel like they are making the right move... its seems safer to stay (although im sure mathematically it is not)
any1 have good reasons to hit..
(besdies stating a very small differnce in % winning/losing differnce STAND VS HIT)
I could understand this logic if it was 1 on 1. but on a table on 4-5 other players i feels like the wrong choice.
well after my "i quit blackjack posts" sorry to say im back again ... i have been back twice after 3 weeks of "qutting" won some money back didnt let my self take it so seriously this time.. went expecting to lose.
one thing i did was hit a soft 18 against a dealer 10.. drawing i think a 6 or 7 hit again for a picture to bust.,(the lady who bet behind had a go at me of course)
the same hand came up ...after some lengthy thought i decided to stand going against basic strat. of course the next card was a "3" i let out a few colorful words but was not surprised ..
my question is...........soft 18 vS TEN and ACE
does any1 actually HIT on soft 18 and feel like they are making the right move... its seems safer to stay (although im sure mathematically it is not)
any1 have good reasons to hit..
(besdies stating a very small differnce in % winning/losing differnce STAND VS HIT)
I could understand this logic if it was 1 on 1. but on a table on 4-5 other players i feels like the wrong choice.