Here are all the comments posted on the site, with the most recent discussions listed first.
To participate in any of these discussions, you can reply on the article page.
Parce que la valeur attendue de l'argent que vous avez à la fin est plus élevée si vous ne le faites pas. Si vous jouez de manière compétente, c'est-à-dire si vous comptez les cartes et passez de la "stratégie de base" à la "stratégie avancée", il y a des moments où vous ferez cela. En particulier, si le décompte réel est supérieur à 2, doublez un 8 contre un 6, et si le décompte réel dépasse 4, doublez un 8 contre un 5. Et si le décompte réel dépasse 6, doublez un 8 contre un 4. Mais la stratégie de base dit de ne faire aucune de ces choses parce que la stratégie de base est l'ensemble des décisions que vous devez prendre lorsque le décompte est à 0, ce qui est le cas en moyenne si vous ne comptez pas les cartes.
The chance you loose 6 in a row is 2.1%. The article then states this will occur 1/47 times. The 1 occurrence is a loss of 6 hands, meaning the other 46 times 6 hands were also played and you won at least 1 time those 6 hands. Meaning a total of 282 total hands of blackjack were played here and six losses in a row occurred 1 time. Giving you the odds 1/47. Now if you use a modified martingale and cap your self at 6 losses in a row with an original bet of 10 your 6th bet will be 320. Your min bank roll would have to be 710. Based on these odds you plan on loosing 710 dollars per ever 282 hands of blackjack you play. However In that 282 you will also win a lot. The min amount of times you can win in 282 is 46. 46×10=$410 $410-710=Net of -300 dollars. However the theoretical amount of times you win in 282 hands based off having 43.3% chance of winning each hand is $1,221. Net profit of 1,221-710= $511. In theory you should alway net more money in 282 hands even when you loose 6 in a row one time.
leave the hand up in the background when you show the stats at the end, please. especially in quick mode, the cards disappear too quickly to absorb what happened! otherwise, great job. love the strategy coach!
i noticed this is not a game for winning, however technique is the more important. The little number at the quit, which indicates the coach agree with you play is more important. WE ALWAY LOOK AT THE MONEY, AND NOT THE TECHNIQUE, THE USA WAY!!
Serait-il possible de paramétrer le trainer pour que l'on puisse jouer 2 mains contre le croupier ? C'est ce que je fais dans les casinos, et c'est plus amusant !
Dealer had a 5 showing. Then turns over a 9. Then takes a 7. If the player hadn’t taken the 2, the dealer would have got the 2 and with a total of 16 have to hit again. The 7 would have busted the dealer in that case.
S'ils vous remboursent vos doubles et vos splits lorsqu'ils tirent un blackjack, vous utilisez la stratégie de base standard et les déviations, comme doubler 11 contre 10, splitter AA contre A, splitter 8 contre 10 et A, et doubler 11 contre A à un vrai 1+ et doubler 10 contre 10 et A à un vrai 4+.
If you’re playing by blackjack rules, you’re going to eventually lose. You’re winnings are the result of luck, not this strategy. This is the best trainer going for sure, but you’re eventually going to lose if you play by these strategies. If you could win simply playing these odds, the casinos would change the rules.
pourquoi ne pas doubler avec un 8 fort contre un 5 ou un 6 ?
Parce que la valeur attendue de l'argent que vous avez à la fin est plus élevée si vous ne le faites pas. Si vous jouez de manière compétente, c'est-à-dire si vous comptez les cartes et passez de la "stratégie de base" à la "stratégie avancée", il y a des moments où vous ferez cela. En particulier, si le décompte réel est supérieur à 2, doublez un 8 contre un 6, et si le décompte réel dépasse 4, doublez un 8 contre un 5. Et si le décompte réel dépasse 6, doublez un 8 contre un 4. Mais la stratégie de base dit de ne faire aucune de ces choses parce que la stratégie de base est l'ensemble des décisions que vous devez prendre lorsque le décompte est à 0, ce qui est le cas en moyenne si vous ne comptez pas les cartes.
The chance you loose 6 in a row is 2.1%. The article then states this will occur 1/47 times. The 1 occurrence is a loss of 6 hands, meaning the other 46 times 6 hands were also played and you won at least 1 time those 6 hands. Meaning a total of 282 total hands of blackjack were played here and six losses in a row occurred 1 time. Giving you the odds 1/47. Now if you use a modified martingale and cap your self at 6 losses in a row with an original bet of 10 your 6th bet will be 320. Your min bank roll would have to be 710. Based on these odds you plan on loosing 710 dollars per ever 282 hands of blackjack you play. However In that 282 you will also win a lot. The min amount of times you can win in 282 is 46. 46×10=$410 $410-710=Net of -300 dollars. However the theoretical amount of times you win in 282 hands based off having 43.3% chance of winning each hand is $1,221. Net profit of 1,221-710= $511. In theory you should alway net more money in 282 hands even when you loose 6 in a row one time.
leave the hand up in the background when you show the stats at the end, please. especially in quick mode, the cards disappear too quickly to absorb what happened! otherwise, great job. love the strategy coach!
Nah this is also what happens in the casino and is good practice
The average player is completely clueless about the rules, odds, and strategy. This has already taken over the strip.
i noticed this is not a game for winning, however technique is the more important. The little number at the quit, which indicates the coach agree with you play is more important. WE ALWAY LOOK AT THE MONEY, AND NOT THE TECHNIQUE, THE USA WAY!!
Serait-il possible de paramétrer le trainer pour que l'on puisse jouer 2 mains contre le croupier ? C'est ce que je fais dans les casinos, et c'est plus amusant !
J'adore ce site ! Je l'utilise depuis des années pour préparer mes voyages à Vegas.
i got 20/20. this website is 100% correct
Dealer had a 5 showing. Then turns over a 9. Then takes a 7. If the player hadn’t taken the 2, the dealer would have got the 2 and with a total of 16 have to hit again. The 7 would have busted the dealer in that case.
Because you’re supposed to hit.
Hi. Actually … this would work. It’s just your belief system that is holding you back not the numbers.
S'ils vous remboursent vos doubles et vos splits lorsqu'ils tirent un blackjack, vous utilisez la stratégie de base standard et les déviations, comme doubler 11 contre 10, splitter AA contre A, splitter 8 contre 10 et A, et doubler 11 contre A à un vrai 1+ et doubler 10 contre 10 et A à un vrai 4+.
Après le partage, les deux cartes séparées sont considérées comme une nouvelle main.
If you’re playing by blackjack rules, you’re going to eventually lose. You’re winnings are the result of luck, not this strategy. This is the best trainer going for sure, but you’re eventually going to lose if you play by these strategies. If you could win simply playing these odds, the casinos would change the rules.
You are wrong. On soft 15 vs 3 you hit. You are thinking of a hard 15.
Switch to a new online provider… 😂 Lol
Retire
apprendre un système de comptage