Нижче наведено всі коментарі, розміщені на сайті, причому найсвіжіші дискусії перераховані першими.
Щоб взяти участь у будь-якому з цих обговорень, ви можете відповісти на сторінці статті.
Чи маю я перевагу при ТК +1? Я думав змінити свій діапазон ставок з ТК 1 = +3 одиниці, ТК 2 = +6 одиниць, ТК 3 = +9 одиниць, ТК 4 = +12 одиниць на цей : ТК +1 = 1 одиниця ТК +2 = 6 одиниць ТК +3 = 9 одиниць і ТК +4 = 12 одиниць.
Руки зіграні: 4,489 Прибуток: + 2,315
Вибачте за всі ці повідомлення. Я б написав лише один раз і просто зіграв би більше роздач, але мене так сильно били, що я подумав, що у мене можуть закінчитися фішки, якщо я пройду через ще один даунсвинг, коли прийде гаряча колода.
Редагувати: Я зробив помилку. Якимось чином кількість зіграних мною роздач зменшилася, і я забув, скільки я зіграв, тому просто додам 100.
Руки зіграні: 4,842 Прибуток: 2,315
Я читав в іншій книзі про блекджек про підрахунок молодших карт, а потім ділити на кількість гравців, але ще не пробував так робити. У мене дуже добре виходить, коли я використовую вашу стратегію гри в блекджек. як щодо системи з низькими картами, описаної вище. хто-небудь її пробував?
My question is , when playing against 6 decks, with late surrender offered, dealer must stand on soft 17, what is your surrender strategy, including a pair of 8s
Hopefully Tum can have the new developers take a look. In the meantime, have you tried another browser? This sounds like a memory allocation issue, and another browser may behave differently.
Hands played: 6,851 Profit: +2,302.5
My hands played is off by no more than 100 so I probably have about 100 less hands played than I should have, probably less. Also, my profit is probably +50 than what it is right now.
It’s a long story.
I am nobody in the gambling the world and seen as a fool but under new supervision I have decided to put more research and depth into blackjack. Now I have so much negative experience putting my money on the tables and watching it exchanged for plastic cheques. Seeing my pile grow from its existing and watching it dwindle upon consecutive losses. What I do have to offer is some data and thoughts to think about for anyone who choses to read my comment. If this program is as similar as it is in the real casino could it actually be possible to win lots of money??? I am always under the suspicion that casinos can cheat and basically get away with it. I am not saying they do and if they were the only culprit is the computers running that shuffle the cards in such an order that does not always seem so random due to the natural variance in the game. I for a lot of time was against basic strategy but at same time maybe I did not know it well enough to be able to say such crazy things.
I played 151 hands on this simulator. profit +6100. now I won 66hands and lost 75. so win% was 44. the natural odds of this game with perfect basic strategy is .5 basically in favor of the house. now ask yourself how did I make so much money??? did I count and bet accordingly? I actually did nothing of any sort. I did something a lot more interesting. I some what of what bet progressively upon wins and losses but only went up in increments of 25. I played perfect basic strategy. when I won a couple of hands I increased my bet 25. when I lost say 4 in a row I increased my bet 25 until getting back up to what I was down etc. then when I felt it was smart to just drop down to base I did so basically. I did this over and over again regardless of win or loss streak. if your playing a game with natural set odds this may be a way to just overcome it because you get the bonus of double downs and blackjacks. you as well get the security when you surrender. this way of playing blackjack can really only be played at card rooms and even then the need to offer 3/2 on bj because at indian casinos you do not get that surrender value
I absolutely agree but at the same time you are not looking at the overall negative play on the game itself and how to use it to your advantage. it has nothing to do with card counting actually. like right now I am trying this test again. I have won 7 hands out of 27. I am of course down money and 100 actually. I am as well at the 150 mark of betting. how long theoretically would it take to be back up? I am playing on a 6 deck shoe and I am just about 50% in
Чи маю я перевагу при ТК +1? Я думав змінити свій діапазон ставок з ТК 1 = +3 одиниці, ТК 2 = +6 одиниць, ТК 3 = +9 одиниць, ТК 4 = +12 одиниць на цей : ТК +1 = 1 одиниця ТК +2 = 6 одиниць ТК +3 = 9 одиниць і ТК +4 = 12 одиниць.
Одного я не розумію. Мені наказано бити 11 проти туза, навіть якщо дилер перевірив, що у нього немає BJ? Хто-небудь може допомогти мені розібратися?
Чому б не подвоїти мої 11 проти туза, який, як довів дилер, не є блекджеком?
Будь ласка, розмістіть це питання на дошці оголошень Форуму. Дякую.
Руки зіграні: 4,742 Прибуток: + 1,842.5
Зав'язка сюжету: Мені надерли дупу
Таке трапляється. Ласкаво просимо до столу.
До речі, дякую, що навчили мене, як оформити страховку. Я забув подякувати тобі раніше.
Руки зіграні: 4,489 Прибуток: + 2,315
Вибачте за всі ці повідомлення. Я б написав лише один раз і просто зіграв би більше роздач, але мене так сильно били, що я подумав, що у мене можуть закінчитися фішки, якщо я пройду через ще один даунсвинг, коли прийде гаряча колода.
Редагувати: Я зробив помилку. Якимось чином кількість зіграних мною роздач зменшилася, і я забув, скільки я зіграв, тому просто додам 100.
Руки зіграні: 4,842 Прибуток: 2,315
Руки зіграні: 5,944 Прибуток + 1,207.5
Збираюся почати взувати дуже негативне взуття.
200 hands played $9000 profit 54% table
Я читав в іншій книзі про блекджек про підрахунок молодших карт, а потім ділити на кількість гравців, але ще не пробував так робити. У мене дуже добре виходить, коли я використовую вашу стратегію гри в блекджек. як щодо системи з низькими картами, описаної вище. хто-небудь її пробував?
My question is , when playing against 6 decks, with late surrender offered, dealer must stand on soft 17, what is your surrender strategy, including a pair of 8s
Hopefully Tum can have the new developers take a look. In the meantime, have you tried another browser? This sounds like a memory allocation issue, and another browser may behave differently.
Hands played: 6,851 Profit: +2,302.5
My hands played is off by no more than 100 so I probably have about 100 less hands played than I should have, probably less. Also, my profit is probably +50 than what it is right now.
It’s a long story.
I am nobody in the gambling the world and seen as a fool but under new supervision I have decided to put more research and depth into blackjack. Now I have so much negative experience putting my money on the tables and watching it exchanged for plastic cheques. Seeing my pile grow from its existing and watching it dwindle upon consecutive losses. What I do have to offer is some data and thoughts to think about for anyone who choses to read my comment. If this program is as similar as it is in the real casino could it actually be possible to win lots of money??? I am always under the suspicion that casinos can cheat and basically get away with it. I am not saying they do and if they were the only culprit is the computers running that shuffle the cards in such an order that does not always seem so random due to the natural variance in the game. I for a lot of time was against basic strategy but at same time maybe I did not know it well enough to be able to say such crazy things.
I played 151 hands on this simulator. profit +6100. now I won 66hands and lost 75. so win% was 44. the natural odds of this game with perfect basic strategy is .5 basically in favor of the house. now ask yourself how did I make so much money??? did I count and bet accordingly? I actually did nothing of any sort. I did something a lot more interesting. I some what of what bet progressively upon wins and losses but only went up in increments of 25. I played perfect basic strategy. when I won a couple of hands I increased my bet 25. when I lost say 4 in a row I increased my bet 25 until getting back up to what I was down etc. then when I felt it was smart to just drop down to base I did so basically. I did this over and over again regardless of win or loss streak. if your playing a game with natural set odds this may be a way to just overcome it because you get the bonus of double downs and blackjacks. you as well get the security when you surrender. this way of playing blackjack can really only be played at card rooms and even then the need to offer 3/2 on bj because at indian casinos you do not get that surrender value
Progressive betting systems don’t work. If you play long enough you will lose.
I absolutely agree but at the same time you are not looking at the overall negative play on the game itself and how to use it to your advantage. it has nothing to do with card counting actually. like right now I am trying this test again. I have won 7 hands out of 27. I am of course down money and 100 actually. I am as well at the 150 mark of betting. how long theoretically would it take to be back up? I am playing on a 6 deck shoe and I am just about 50% in
You should read this: https://www.gamblingsites.com/systems-strategies/progressive-betting/
and this : http://www.vegasgamblesonline.com/why-progressive-gambling.html
I can guarantee you that if you keep playing you’re going to lose. It becomes literally impossible for you to win if you play enough hands because of the law of large numbers. Which is this http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/law-of-large-numbers
Тобі пощастило. Хотів би я мати гру з таким проникненням.