Ecco tutti i commenti pubblicati sul sito, con le discussioni più recenti elencate per prime.
Per partecipare a una qualsiasi di queste discussioni, potete rispondere nella pagina dell'articolo.
Hi i have just started playing blackjack and i am doing fair your basic strategy game is a wonder. my question is at the casino all the games have a side bet are these side bets worth playing
Ho provato il conteggio delle carte a mazzo singolo al casinò Harrah's di South Carolin e, grazie a voi, ho vinto $500 in 3 ore!
Sono appena uscito dal college e andrò al casinò Harrahs a giugno! Il modo in cui conto le carte è: ci sono 16 carte che equivalgono a 10, in un normale mazzo di carte! Quindi, questo ti dà circa il 32% di possibilità, credo, che la carta che viene distribuita sia un dieci!
Comunque, questo è il mio modo di contare le carte! Non è elegante come quello di tutti voi, ma per me funziona!
Solo per informazione. Tre o quattro delle combinazioni di tre carte nell'Esercizio di decisione sulla strategia di base di cui sopra non sono scenari possibili. Cioè, a volte le prime due carte (o due qualsiasi delle tre mostrate) imporrebbero un raddoppio, impedendo che vengano distribuite tre carte alla mano.
Correzione: Quando si raddoppia, ovviamente si finisce con tre carte. Intendevo dire che quando avete due carte e raddoppiate, non vi sarà mai presentata un'altra domanda di decisione. La terza carta sarà quella finale e non ci sarà alcuna decisione da prendere. Nessun "esercizio di decisione".
Thank you for providing such a nice training game, it is very informative and a valuable training tool.
I do find the screen difficult to see as the contrast seems to be on the weak side. Other than that one minor issue your game is excellent.
You also didn’t factor in the 3/2 payoff on a blackjack that can be the streak ender. If you bet, say $640 after your 6th loss in a row and hit a blackjack, you make $330, not $10. Also, since double-downs and most splits are in your favor, while you certainly need a much bigger bankroll for the possibility that you’ll get deal an 11 when the dealer has a 6, those hands also put the odds in your favor when you have the most money on the table.
You have a 1/20 prob. of being dealt a blackjack w only a 1/25 chance (assuming 8-deck shoe) of having your blackjack pushed. Suppose you are playing a 13 loss Martingale, then that means you will have 200 strings that end with you getting a blackjack and making $10 plus your bet on the string. Simply counting $10 profit on every string ending in a loss and multiplying by the number of times you can expect to win and then subtracting by the total lost win you do run through the string is incorrect. Perhaps, you can figure the math using martingale relative to expected losses while figuring in the mathematics of a 3/2 payoff on the probability of each length string ended by a blackjack?
You’re right. I ignored blackjacks in this simplified comparison, just like I ignored doubles and splits. The math gets quite a bit messier, although I suppose it would fairly easy to account for only the blackjacks. The conclusion is however unavoidable. In blackjack, your expected loss is the total of your bets times the house edge, unless you vary your bets based on the deck composition instead of some scheme based on a string of wins or losses. No progression can change that fact. Feel free to work it out in laborious detail if that interests you. It doesn’t interest me.
Reading all of this right now and I must ask 2 questions:
1. This one seems obvious for me but either way: Gambling with these odds and this little money seems to be a waste of time compared to just working. But for me if I go to a Casino I want to play with the best odds at least and have some influence over the game so yeah.
So the question: Is it even worth it in your opinion to invest months of time learning and playing BlackJack for that amount of money? (If it really just is the money you want)
2. The more important question for me: I haven’t found a table with <$10 yet and am not playing with more than $100
I know that's not a lot but that's what I can (easily) spare for gambling.
At the live dealer machine the minimum would be $5 but no way to count right? also the game can be predetermined beforehand. So machine isn't worth it right?
So how would you advice me to handle my moneymanagement as playing with a minimum of $10 would bring me to bets I couldn't even do if it were 6 or higher TC.
Also: The dealers shuffle the decks again after using 1/2-1 deck.
Taking your advice I'm not fit to play the game at all under these conditions if I understand everything correctly.
But honestly I cannot imagine that everybody reading this has a payroll high enough to be able to easily spend $3000 (which you should be willing to if you start this game seriously if I understand this article correctly (or at least something in the area of $1000)).
Also I cannot imagine that most Casinos wouldn't reshuffle after the approximate amount of cards for 1 deck is played.
(At least I haven't seen it happen).
Sidequestion: How do I know how many decks are played, asking the dealer would be suspicious right?
I'd be happy for any advice on this!
As far as I'm concerned I'll stick to play basic strategy and try to see it as entertainment since I do not see me winning (or winning enough) in the long run. But for the sake of optimising my play I'd still like to hear your advice 🙂
Ciao.
Un casinò locale nelle vicinanze ha delle regole strane a questo proposito: 6D, S17, raddoppio qualsiasi, re-split eccetto As, raddoppio dopo lo split, nessun picco.
La resa è consentita tranne che contro gli As, poiché non c'è alcun picco da parte del banco. Mi chiedo come dovrei impostare il motore della strategia di base? Con una resa anticipata o tardiva?
Un croupier di un casinò di Las Vegas mi ha detto che le macchine ShuffleMaster mescolano le carte in modo numerico! C'è da riflettere. Ogni reazione è gradita. Grazie
Finalmente una voce razionale... Tutto vero... 6 5 è un ottimo gioco per esercitarsi nel conteggio con puntate a basso limite... Una cosa importante non menzionata... Quando il conteggio va a fuoco, quali casinò ordinano ai dealer di mescolare la seconda serie di carte ad un tavolo pieno... QUESTO può cambiare tutto!!!
Hi i have just started playing blackjack and i am doing fair your basic strategy game is a wonder. my question is at the casino all the games have a side bet are these side bets worth playing
Ho provato il conteggio delle carte a mazzo singolo al casinò Harrah's di South Carolin e, grazie a voi, ho vinto $500 in 3 ore!
Sono appena uscito dal college e andrò al casinò Harrahs a giugno! Il modo in cui conto le carte è: ci sono 16 carte che equivalgono a 10, in un normale mazzo di carte! Quindi, questo ti dà circa il 32% di possibilità, credo, che la carta che viene distribuita sia un dieci!
Comunque, questo è il mio modo di contare le carte! Non è elegante come quello di tutti voi, ma per me funziona!
Solo per informazione. Tre o quattro delle combinazioni di tre carte nell'Esercizio di decisione sulla strategia di base di cui sopra non sono scenari possibili. Cioè, a volte le prime due carte (o due qualsiasi delle tre mostrate) imporrebbero un raddoppio, impedendo che vengano distribuite tre carte alla mano.
Correzione: Quando si raddoppia, ovviamente si finisce con tre carte. Intendevo dire che quando avete due carte e raddoppiate, non vi sarà mai presentata un'altra domanda di decisione. La terza carta sarà quella finale e non ci sarà alcuna decisione da prendere. Nessun "esercizio di decisione".
Potresti controllare la linea A5 nel grafico per verificare la precisione rispetto a 4 e 7. Mi piace tutto il materiale che hai messo a disposizione.
Ops, era sicuramente un errore di battitura. Grazie per averlo notato! L'ho appena corretto.
prova a giocare
non leggere
La scommessa gratuita è uno dei peggiori giochi in circolazione.
Thank you for providing such a nice training game, it is very informative and a valuable training tool.
I do find the screen difficult to see as the contrast seems to be on the weak side. Other than that one minor issue your game is excellent.
You also didn’t factor in the 3/2 payoff on a blackjack that can be the streak ender. If you bet, say $640 after your 6th loss in a row and hit a blackjack, you make $330, not $10. Also, since double-downs and most splits are in your favor, while you certainly need a much bigger bankroll for the possibility that you’ll get deal an 11 when the dealer has a 6, those hands also put the odds in your favor when you have the most money on the table.
You have a 1/20 prob. of being dealt a blackjack w only a 1/25 chance (assuming 8-deck shoe) of having your blackjack pushed. Suppose you are playing a 13 loss Martingale, then that means you will have 200 strings that end with you getting a blackjack and making $10 plus your bet on the string. Simply counting $10 profit on every string ending in a loss and multiplying by the number of times you can expect to win and then subtracting by the total lost win you do run through the string is incorrect. Perhaps, you can figure the math using martingale relative to expected losses while figuring in the mathematics of a 3/2 payoff on the probability of each length string ended by a blackjack?
You’re right. I ignored blackjacks in this simplified comparison, just like I ignored doubles and splits. The math gets quite a bit messier, although I suppose it would fairly easy to account for only the blackjacks. The conclusion is however unavoidable. In blackjack, your expected loss is the total of your bets times the house edge, unless you vary your bets based on the deck composition instead of some scheme based on a string of wins or losses. No progression can change that fact. Feel free to work it out in laborious detail if that interests you. It doesn’t interest me.
Reading all of this right now and I must ask 2 questions:
1. This one seems obvious for me but either way: Gambling with these odds and this little money seems to be a waste of time compared to just working. But for me if I go to a Casino I want to play with the best odds at least and have some influence over the game so yeah.
So the question: Is it even worth it in your opinion to invest months of time learning and playing BlackJack for that amount of money? (If it really just is the money you want)
2. The more important question for me: I haven’t found a table with <$10 yet and am not playing with more than $100
I know that's not a lot but that's what I can (easily) spare for gambling.
At the live dealer machine the minimum would be $5 but no way to count right? also the game can be predetermined beforehand. So machine isn't worth it right?
So how would you advice me to handle my moneymanagement as playing with a minimum of $10 would bring me to bets I couldn't even do if it were 6 or higher TC.
Also: The dealers shuffle the decks again after using 1/2-1 deck.
Taking your advice I'm not fit to play the game at all under these conditions if I understand everything correctly.
But honestly I cannot imagine that everybody reading this has a payroll high enough to be able to easily spend $3000 (which you should be willing to if you start this game seriously if I understand this article correctly (or at least something in the area of $1000)).
Also I cannot imagine that most Casinos wouldn't reshuffle after the approximate amount of cards for 1 deck is played.
(At least I haven't seen it happen).
Sidequestion: How do I know how many decks are played, asking the dealer would be suspicious right?
I'd be happy for any advice on this!
As far as I'm concerned I'll stick to play basic strategy and try to see it as entertainment since I do not see me winning (or winning enough) in the long run. But for the sake of optimising my play I'd still like to hear your advice 🙂
Grazie!
Ciao.
Un casinò locale nelle vicinanze ha delle regole strane a questo proposito: 6D, S17, raddoppio qualsiasi, re-split eccetto As, raddoppio dopo lo split, nessun picco.
La resa è consentita tranne che contro gli As, poiché non c'è alcun picco da parte del banco. Mi chiedo come dovrei impostare il motore della strategia di base? Con una resa anticipata o tardiva?
Grazie per la tua risposta... saluti...
40? Non siete sicuramente pronti
If I play perfect basic strategy, can I win more often if I use a positive progression at the same time?
Un croupier di un casinò di Las Vegas mi ha detto che le macchine ShuffleMaster mescolano le carte in modo numerico! C'è da riflettere. Ogni reazione è gradita. Grazie
Finalmente una voce razionale... Tutto vero... 6 5 è un ottimo gioco per esercitarsi nel conteggio con puntate a basso limite... Una cosa importante non menzionata... Quando il conteggio va a fuoco, quali casinò ordinano ai dealer di mescolare la seconda serie di carte ad un tavolo pieno... QUESTO può cambiare tutto!!!
You don’t know anything about blackjack
Thank you very much for the explanation. I wasn’t aware of that, and silently cursed players for doing this.