Нижче наведено всі коментарі, розміщені на сайті, причому найсвіжіші дискусії перераховані першими.
Щоб взяти участь у будь-якому з цих обговорень, ви можете відповісти на сторінці статті.
Привіт!
Я припускаю, що підвищена вигода від підрахунку карт пов'язана з тим, що здача, коли у нас велика ставка на столі, заощадить нам пропорційно більше грошей (велика кількість карт, більша ставка). Чи є ще якісь варіанти, про які нам потрібно знати?
Ще раз дякуємо за сайт і допомогу
Бен.
Sam vaughn was my first cousin, over the years I had lost contact with him. I only knew that he had moved to Phoenix. I have not have contact in years.
Thank you.
I found different values for the case of infinite number of decks and dealer stand’s on all 17, too.
Please note, that all columns should yield 100 % in sum. But this is not true for the last two colums (tens and aces) of the diagram! I’ve got identical values for the columns 2 to 9 but different ones for 10 and ace.
Apparently you did not read the description at the top of the page. The Ace and Ten columns are after the dealer has checked for blackjack and did not have it. That method is far more useful for most purposes than including blackjack in the normal totals.
Проста відповідь полягає в тому, що якщо ви зберете 15vA в грі S17, то в середньому втратите менше половини своєї ставки (це приблизно -0.48 або -0.49). Чому поради відрізняються для ігор H17 і S17? (Ви повинні зібрати 15vA в S17, але здати 15vA в H17.) Підсумкова сума дилера в середньому буде трохи вищою в H17, що погіршує ваші шанси при збиранні. Але в принципі, базову стратегію часто важко пояснити простою причиною. Це комбінація багатьох змінних. Просто довіртеся математиці. Всі можливі результати зважуються при виборі оптимальної стратегії. Щоб отримати індивідуальні графіки, обов'язково використовуйте наші Движок стратегій.
Боже, як би я хотів мати 10 центів за кожен раз, коли я намагався пояснити це забобонному гравцеві.
Дякую, що нарешті виклали це в письмовому вигляді, тепер я можу просто вказувати людям на цю статтю і заощаджувати своє дихання.
One of the local casinos has a couple of tables with oddball rules, such as one where the house will pay for a double or split under certain conditions. Any easy way to calculate odds for such oddities?
More generally, most of these unusual variants are very difficult to analyze using existing tools. You really need to be able to write your own software to do it.
Your website rocks. I use the Wong Halves count but I’m curious whether another betting system is more efficient for single deck games. I believe most of the benefit from the halves system is from the betting precision, but I’m not sure whether in a single deck game that could be outweighed by a system with a higher playing efficiency. Assuming no obstacles for learning a new system, which would be the Utopian single deck system in your opinion?
I work at the El Cortez and can confirm that as of today we are still a 3:2 payout (and I don’t think it’s going to change any time soon). The mentality at the LV strip seems to be that you aren’t here for winning, you are here to spend.
Ten years ago, online casinos were a fantastic opportunity, because of the generous bonus offers and promotions. They have been exploited so frequently that this opportunity is pretty much gone, due to much more restrictive wagering requirements. Since I am in the US (and not usually in New Jersey), I don’t have recent experience with any alternatives for beating casinos online. My guess is that you are unlikely to find much of an edge.
Your comment about trying to beat the game by using basic strategy is a little misguided, although I realize you may not mean it quite literally. If you play a negative expectation game long enough, any good luck that you happen to experience will not be enough to keep you ahead of the game. It’s just a matter of time. In games like this, if you are entertained by playing, then it may be reasonable for you to play. (And basic strategy will reduce your expected cost to a small amount.) But don’t expect to create a profit.
Yeah that was kind of what i was “afraid” for. Is there a way to beat the online casino like counting in a land-based casino, or is the only way to try and beat it, by lower the dealers chance to win by using a Basic chart? I just feel like, using the chart as i did before i learned how to count cards, it wasn’t very profitable. I lost a 100, won a 100 and so on, but never a bigger win?
Привіт!
Я припускаю, що підвищена вигода від підрахунку карт пов'язана з тим, що здача, коли у нас велика ставка на столі, заощадить нам пропорційно більше грошей (велика кількість карт, більша ставка). Чи є ще якісь варіанти, про які нам потрібно знати?
Ще раз дякуємо за сайт і допомогу
Бен.
На додаток до базової стратегії капітуляції, ви можете використовувати індекси капітуляції "Fab 4".
Ось посилання, яке показує їх за кількістю Hi-Lo:
https://www.blackjackinfo.com/knowledge-base/blackjack-card-counting/fab-4/#kb-post-35914
Щоб було зрозуміло, ви повинні здатися, коли ТК дорівнює або перевищує вказаний індексний номер.
First cousin
Thanks for dropping by Dick. Sammy was a unique and warm soul. He is missed by many.
Sam vaughn was my first cousin, over the years I had lost contact with him. I only knew that he had moved to Phoenix. I have not have contact in years.
Thank you.
Are the numbers “running count” or “true count”,,,am a little bit connfused?
Index numbers for the Hi-Lo count always use the true count.
I found different values for the case of infinite number of decks and dealer stand’s on all 17, too.
Please note, that all columns should yield 100 % in sum. But this is not true for the last two colums (tens and aces) of the diagram! I’ve got identical values for the columns 2 to 9 but different ones for 10 and ace.
Apparently you did not read the description at the top of the page. The Ace and Ten columns are after the dealer has checked for blackjack and did not have it. That method is far more useful for most purposes than including blackjack in the normal totals.
Чи можете ви пояснити, чому не варто здаватися на хард 15 проти дилера А? (За правилом казино S17)
Проста відповідь полягає в тому, що якщо ви зберете 15vA в грі S17, то в середньому втратите менше половини своєї ставки (це приблизно -0.48 або -0.49). Чому поради відрізняються для ігор H17 і S17? (Ви повинні зібрати 15vA в S17, але здати 15vA в H17.) Підсумкова сума дилера в середньому буде трохи вищою в H17, що погіршує ваші шанси при збиранні. Але в принципі, базову стратегію часто важко пояснити простою причиною. Це комбінація багатьох змінних. Просто довіртеся математиці. Всі можливі результати зважуються при виборі оптимальної стратегії. Щоб отримати індивідуальні графіки, обов'язково використовуйте наші Движок стратегій.
Поштовх відстійний, якщо я подвоюю свої 11 проти 6 дилера, а він витягує з мене 21.
Боже, як би я хотів мати 10 центів за кожен раз, коли я намагався пояснити це забобонному гравцеві.
Дякую, що нарешті виклали це в письмовому вигляді, тепер я можу просто вказувати людям на цю статтю і заощаджувати своє дихання.
One of the local casinos has a couple of tables with oddball rules, such as one where the house will pay for a double or split under certain conditions. Any easy way to calculate odds for such oddities?
That sounds like Free Bet Blackjack. See this site for more details on it:
http://discountgambling.net/2012/06/22/free-bet-blackjack-golden-nugget-lv/
More generally, most of these unusual variants are very difficult to analyze using existing tools. You really need to be able to write your own software to do it.
Привіт, Кене,
Your website rocks. I use the Wong Halves count but I’m curious whether another betting system is more efficient for single deck games. I believe most of the benefit from the halves system is from the betting precision, but I’m not sure whether in a single deck game that could be outweighed by a system with a higher playing efficiency. Assuming no obstacles for learning a new system, which would be the Utopian single deck system in your opinion?
Thanks for confirming. Long live downtown!
I work at the El Cortez and can confirm that as of today we are still a 3:2 payout (and I don’t think it’s going to change any time soon). The mentality at the LV strip seems to be that you aren’t here for winning, you are here to spend.
Ten years ago, online casinos were a fantastic opportunity, because of the generous bonus offers and promotions. They have been exploited so frequently that this opportunity is pretty much gone, due to much more restrictive wagering requirements. Since I am in the US (and not usually in New Jersey), I don’t have recent experience with any alternatives for beating casinos online. My guess is that you are unlikely to find much of an edge.
Your comment about trying to beat the game by using basic strategy is a little misguided, although I realize you may not mean it quite literally. If you play a negative expectation game long enough, any good luck that you happen to experience will not be enough to keep you ahead of the game. It’s just a matter of time. In games like this, if you are entertained by playing, then it may be reasonable for you to play. (And basic strategy will reduce your expected cost to a small amount.) But don’t expect to create a profit.
Thanks for the answer 🙂
Yeah that was kind of what i was “afraid” for. Is there a way to beat the online casino like counting in a land-based casino, or is the only way to try and beat it, by lower the dealers chance to win by using a Basic chart? I just feel like, using the chart as i did before i learned how to count cards, it wasn’t very profitable. I lost a 100, won a 100 and so on, but never a bigger win?