Здесь представлены все комментарии, опубликованные на сайте, причем самые последние обсуждения указаны первыми.
Чтобы принять участие в любом из этих обсуждений, вы можете ответить на странице статьи.
I don’t understand why people go through such clumsy and hectic mathematics and software when it comes to gambling. For me gambling is just a fun where you want to win but not earn knowing the expected loss you are willing to bear. It is sophisticated math when we talk about probability. When something is uncertain just enjoy the uncertainty. DOn’t bother with it anymore.
Лучше всего объяснить это так. Джонни Клуэлесс просит сделать хит. Вместо того чтобы дилер отдал ему следующую карту из колоды, дилер предлагает вам выбрать любую оставшуюся карту в колоде и отдать ее Джонни. Стоит ли вам воспользоваться этой возможностью? Следующая карта и та, которую вы выберете, находились в колоде на одном и том же месте с момента тасовки. Если вы думаете, что у этих двух карт в этих двух позициях сейчас разные шансы оказаться десяткой, значит, так было и с этими двумя картами сразу после тасовки. Каждая карта в колоде имеет одинаковые шансы стать десяткой после тасовки. Вы не доверяете тасовке?
i was playing black jack at the casino in sudbury. when splitting two face cards the machine aloud me to play each card seperatly like two seperate hands but when splitting two aces the machine gave me one card on each ace and then played its hand not allowing me to play the aces at all . is this a common practice.
I’m using the Red 7 counting system and have been practicing counting for about a week. I keep losing count about midway through the deck. Does anyone else have this problem? Any help will be appreciated.
Everything published about the Red 7 count got one thing wrong. On a single deck the IRC is -2 and
they say when your finished counting down a deck of cards you should end with a +2. Wrong!!!!!!
The running count should be 0 at the end of the deck not +2. Even Arnold Snyder got it wrong and
he’s the author of the book. Everyone else in these Blackjack forums that publishing stories on the RED 7 system also got it wrong. It seems they blindly write these articles without checking. No wonder I was having a hard time
counting down a deck of cards.
Correct, when the dealer hits soft 17, you still double 11vA. If the dealer stands on soft 17, you just hit (unless you are playing a one or two deck game.)
For exact strategies for your rules, see the Стратегический двигатель.
ЧТО? Я даже не могу понять, что вы пытаетесь сказать.
но если бы вы обратили внимание на то, что написано в статье, вы бы услышали, что это действительно влияет на игру, как они играют. это влияет как положительно, так и отрицательно в среднем в равной степени.
I agree, I’ve found playing short rounds, betting to make up for losses and stopping after the winning streak of that session leaves me ahead every time and usual with a small decent haul of sometimes 200 to 300 dollars over the course of an hour. If i had 10’s of thousands of dollars to blow could see that small haul exponentially being impressive, but in reality with a small gambling egg and playing perfectly with all the tiny bonuses in your favor your winnings are equivalent to an hourly mediocre job through the course of a day. The biggest rule I feel that doesn’t work and I ignore but statistically has the law of probability in its favor is holding on 12 to 16 hoping the dealer breaks. Mathematically its theory is probably good on paper but in reality the dealer mostly always comes out ahead.
so it takes overall about 20,000 hands to have any sort of data that is relatively average of what your mathematical expectation should be if you were to card count with an advantage. so I played 1 shoe and lost -1100. I flat betted 100%. I won 14 hands and lost 33. my winning % was 28 which is below average expectation. I as well lost my double downs so that is why I was down so much money just on a short sample
I won 56% of my hands 27 won and 18 lost. profit was +$1237.5. only won 1 double down out of 4. pushed on 1
Am I ready to take on the casino? The casino i’m going to be targeting cuts of 2 decks out of their 6 deck shoe instead of just 1.
I don’t understand why people go through such clumsy and hectic mathematics and software when it comes to gambling. For me gambling is just a fun where you want to win but not earn knowing the expected loss you are willing to bear. It is sophisticated math when we talk about probability. When something is uncertain just enjoy the uncertainty. DOn’t bother with it anymore.
If dealer has black jack and says they don’t and game continues and you get 21 as well what is the recourse.
Лучше всего объяснить это так. Джонни Клуэлесс просит сделать хит. Вместо того чтобы дилер отдал ему следующую карту из колоды, дилер предлагает вам выбрать любую оставшуюся карту в колоде и отдать ее Джонни. Стоит ли вам воспользоваться этой возможностью? Следующая карта и та, которую вы выберете, находились в колоде на одном и том же месте с момента тасовки. Если вы думаете, что у этих двух карт в этих двух позициях сейчас разные шансы оказаться десяткой, значит, так было и с этими двумя картами сразу после тасовки. Каждая карта в колоде имеет одинаковые шансы стать десяткой после тасовки. Вы не доверяете тасовке?
i was playing black jack at the casino in sudbury. when splitting two face cards the machine aloud me to play each card seperatly like two seperate hands but when splitting two aces the machine gave me one card on each ace and then played its hand not allowing me to play the aces at all . is this a common practice.
On the 8,8 hands if I can surrender am I saving or loosing money vs the 10 and the A.??
BB
On the 8,8 hands if I can surrender am I saving or loosing money vs the 10 and the A.??
BB
I’m using the Red 7 counting system and have been practicing counting for about a week. I keep losing count about midway through the deck. Does anyone else have this problem? Any help will be appreciated.
Everything published about the Red 7 count got one thing wrong. On a single deck the IRC is -2 and
they say when your finished counting down a deck of cards you should end with a +2. Wrong!!!!!!
The running count should be 0 at the end of the deck not +2. Even Arnold Snyder got it wrong and
he’s the author of the book. Everyone else in these Blackjack forums that publishing stories on the RED 7 system also got it wrong. It seems they blindly write these articles without checking. No wonder I was having a hard time
counting down a deck of cards.
What would you do if you have a hard 11 and dealer is showing an Ace? 6-deck game, dealer hits on soft 17. I would still double, am I wrong?
Correct, when the dealer hits soft 17, you still double 11vA. If the dealer stands on soft 17, you just hit (unless you are playing a one or two deck game.)
For exact strategies for your rules, see the Стратегический двигатель.
4×8=32
you wanna win dont gamble the house AlWAYS WINS
Not in Oz
Ive always wondered and it is the way to go.
Nope, There is no system to win in Blackjack, except counting cards. (And even that can not guarantee a win.)
ЧТО? Я даже не могу понять, что вы пытаетесь сказать.
но если бы вы обратили внимание на то, что написано в статье, вы бы услышали, что это действительно влияет на игру, как они играют. это влияет как положительно, так и отрицательно в среднем в равной степени.
I agree, I’ve found playing short rounds, betting to make up for losses and stopping after the winning streak of that session leaves me ahead every time and usual with a small decent haul of sometimes 200 to 300 dollars over the course of an hour. If i had 10’s of thousands of dollars to blow could see that small haul exponentially being impressive, but in reality with a small gambling egg and playing perfectly with all the tiny bonuses in your favor your winnings are equivalent to an hourly mediocre job through the course of a day. The biggest rule I feel that doesn’t work and I ignore but statistically has the law of probability in its favor is holding on 12 to 16 hoping the dealer breaks. Mathematically its theory is probably good on paper but in reality the dealer mostly always comes out ahead.
so it takes overall about 20,000 hands to have any sort of data that is relatively average of what your mathematical expectation should be if you were to card count with an advantage. so I played 1 shoe and lost -1100. I flat betted 100%. I won 14 hands and lost 33. my winning % was 28 which is below average expectation. I as well lost my double downs so that is why I was down so much money just on a short sample